Automated translation. This page was machine translated from DE and may contain mistakes.

Finances of the municipality of Beringen

I created a few charts based on the municipality of Beringen’s financial statements and budgets. I may have made mistakes — if you spot one, please let me know.

Per-capita spending in Beringen

 

45%19%17%8%5%3%2%2%Bildung [1424]Soziale Wohlfart [582]Verwaltung [524]Gesundheit [238]Kultur&Freizeit [146]Verkehr [82]Öff. Sicherheit [72]Umwelt & Raumplanung [47]Volkswirtschaft [17]

Beringen takes in CHF 3,010 per resident per year and spends roughly the same amount (CHF 3,133). On their own, these numbers don’t say much — but we can compare them with a neighboring municipality:

Comparison with Neunkirch

 

41%20%14%8%5%4%3%3%1%Bildung [1356]Soziale Wohlfart [659]Verwaltung [473]Gesundheit [97]Kultur&Freizeit [138]Verkehr [273]Öff. Sicherheit [164]Umwelt & Raumplanung [99]Volkswirtschaft [36] With CHF 3,213, Neunkirch takes in slightly more per person. It’s striking that Neunkirch spends more than three times as much on transport. On the other hand, it spends far less on health. For public safety, environment & spatial planning, and the local economy, Neunkirch spends about twice as much as Beringen. Comparisons like this can help (for example, as a member of an audit committee) identify where it might be worth taking a closer look.

Development

The trend over time matters as well: are the figures rising or falling? For example, it is repeatedly claimed that Beringen’s debt is too high, but the numbers don’t support that. Debt has been stable between CHF 34 and 39 million — about CHF 7,000 per resident.

 

Fremdkapital202020212022202320244035302520151050Millionen CHF

Negative developments

Some notable developments show up in per-capita spending by category. The following are increasing, so it may be worth monitoring them more closely.

 

Verwaltungskosten pro Person2012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024600550500450400350300250200150100500CHF pro Person

 

Öffentliche Sicherheitskosten pro Person201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202480706050403020100CHF pro Person

 

Gesundheitskosten pro Person20202021202220232024240220200180160140120100806040200CHF pro Person I start this chart in 2020 because there was a system change, so earlier numbers aren’t comparable.

Positive developments

On the other hand, there are trends that are pleasing.

 

Verkehrskosten pro Person2012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024550500450400350300250200150100500CHF pro Person

 

Umwelt & Raumplanungskosten pro Person20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241009080706050403020100CHF pro Person

Is the budget realistic?

The budget is prepared every year. In principle, it should be an analytical tool: a best-effort estimate of spending and revenue for the coming year. In practice, budgets are also used politically — to justify austerity measures or to frame a narrative. Here I look at the gap between the budget and the actual result. Note that in 2021 there was an unexpectedly large one-off tax payment from the business sector. Every year has a few items that aren’t anticipated, but over time they tend to average out.

I was able to compare budgets and actuals back to 2020. I didn’t have budget data for earlier years.

Year Actual (CHF) Budget (CHF) Difference (CHF)
2020 -230,101 -328,630 -98,529
2021 1,066,430 -205,694 -1,272,124
2022 124,426 -68,785 -193,211
2023 151,917 -197,471 -349,388
2024 -647,740 -784,180 -136,440

The actual result has never been worse than the budget. On average, the budget is CHF 409,000 too pessimistic, and the median gap is CHF 193,000. That looks systematic. A conservative budget can be used to justify cuts, or at least to argue against new spending. It can also make it easier for the municipal council to claim success (“we did better than budgeted”). In 2024, the result would have been even more positive if an unexpected tax repayment hadn’t occurred. I’m not complaining about a good result — but in my view this can amount to spin, and to misusing the budget as an instrument.

GitHub